Wednesday, April 15, 2020

Should police officers be allowed to moonlight as private security providers Essay Example

Should police officers be allowed to moonlight as private security providers Essay There are very few professions nowadays that provide financially fulfilling compensation. Not everybody can be a surgeon, lawyer, professional athlete or celebrity: professions that are sure to provide luxurious living. Often times, working men and women have to work multiple jobs to provide for their families, send their kids to school, or simply just to get by in life. Almost every human being on the planet has a right to earn decent wages to get a decent living, even if this means juggling different lines of work. People who hold sensitive public office positions are among the few exceptions. They need to give their full attention to the job at hand.   Included in this exclusive list are the people in the law enforcement field. Police officers should not be allowed to take off duty jobs which conflict with their status as police officers.Being a cop means you have accepted a high profile position with little or no reward. The starting annual income for a police officer in New Yo rk is estimated to be about $ 25,100 (AP, 2007). Plumbers and Sanitation workers make more. Not to demean the other professions but police officers put their lives at risk every time they put on the uniform so they are grossly underpaid. It is sad that they do not earn more, but they still should not be allowed to take on private security positions to earn extra income. Taking on a similar profession without the safeguards that make law enforcement work in the first place, can lead to disastrous repercussions. Therefore, they should not be allowed to moonlight as private security providers.Conflict of interestMost cities throughout the United States have police officers take on private security work when off duty. This could spell conflict of interest on so many levels. A cop’s loyalty is supposed to be to the general public. They are tasked with implementing peace and order in their area of responsibility regardless of race, age, gender or social status. On the other hand, a private security officer’s loyalty is to the individual or corporation that hired him. The Director of the Juvenile Justice Center in Boston, Lisa Thurau-Gray, says that the private police prioritize the interest of their employer more than public safety and rights (Goldstein, 2007). If the interest of public and private employer crossover, it is not surprising for the police officer to be conflicted and confused. As an example, suppose an off duty police officer operates as personal security for a private individual, lets say that the individual is suspected of a crime while in the protection of the off duty officer. Once media learns that a cop is somehow involved, how then is the police officer supposed to position himself to preserve his integrity? When a cop witnesses a crime that requires immediate action like a hostage situation or a bank heist, is he supposed to let it pass because he’s on private security detail? The only definitive answer is that he should n ot have been in the position to choose in the first place.Possible human rights violationState and nationwide laws have provisions that protect citizens from law enforcement violations. Search of ones premises or belongings require a search warrant, arresting a suspect needs a warrant of arrest, questioning suspects must be in the presence of a lawyer. These are just some of the rights afforded to citizens. Nonconformance with any of these requisites is considered a violation under the law. The police department and the arresting officer can be sued for such erroneous misdeeds. This is not necessarily true for private security providers. While off duty as a cop, a private security enforcer does not necessarily need a lawyer to extract information from a suspect. Miranda rights do not need to be enforced. This means that an officer who has internal knowledge of the â€Å"rights and wrongs† of police procedure can work around them on his private time. A situation like this coul d lead to less civil interrogation techniques that could lead to brutality, which might not even fall under the category of police brutality because the officer is technically off-duty. This is not to insinuate that this is normal practice, this situation would surely not be of the common variety, only that the opportunity to take advantage of police protocols presents itself if a public law enforcer is allowed to spend his off-duty hours doing private police work.Paid on the clockSpecial police or private police are paid by the hour. As with other private companies, private security providers want the most of what they pay their employees and try to cut back on unnecessary expenses to save company money. While other companies generate savings by cutting back on supplies, energy consumption, and recycling, private security firms save by cutting back on court appearances and testifying before the judiciary. Police Captain Kenny Mangum and police officer Matt Saylors, while on patrol as private security for Capitol Special Police (CSP), found illegal drugs and handguns in a car of a convicted felon. Despite the potential danger of civilians using drugs and guns, the two off-duty officers did not make the arrest but did call in on-duty police officers to do it. CSP reasons that they are careful in billing clients with time spent testifying and therefore make arrests only when absolutely necessary (Goldstein, 2007). Such a choice has potentially deadly consequences had the driver and his companions decided to use the weapons at their disposal. Had Mangum and Saylors not been allowed to do private security work, they would have undoubtedly proceeded with an immediate arrest since diffusing dangerous situations as quickly as possible is part of the police officer’s job description. This is clearly one instance where the moonlighting sideline got in the way of what would have normally been a routine bust.Perception of a protection racketThe public police popul ation in the United States number to around 700,000 officers (Goldstein, 2007). They are outnumbered by private security police, 5 to 1 (Schneier, 2007). Despite their lack in numbers, it is their sworn duty to protect the citizens as they patrol their areas of their jurisdiction. Now, private subdivisions want the same security. Private suburbs in Maryland and Virginia, among others, have begun to entice police officers to enforce public laws in their areas, presumably for a fee (VIC, 2000). This gives a negative impression to tax payers that certain locations are more protected than others. Public trust is fragile, so even the slightest perception that law enforcement favors those who can pay for it must always be avoided.Separation between private and public policeThe private sector should have the right to protect their interests and hire additional security. It makes sense to try and hire police officers because they are better trained, experienced on the field and are best sui ted for the job. But cops, even off-duty, should not be allowed to moonlight as private security providers. The public needs, demands their full attention. Although they work in shifts with almost no overtime pay, they’re actually much like doctors. They’re always on-call 24-7. Carl Dunde, a police officer with 18 years of experience, said that police officers are never really off-duty (Dunde, 2007).   A cop can go shopping, jogging, or walking their dog, but once a thief comes running, they come running after them, whether it’s in uniform or in their pajamas. A police officer’s work is never done.If law enforcers want to earn more and serve the private sector, they should quit. They can make their services available to the private security institutions and perhaps make a lucrative career out of it. But for the meantime, being a cop is public service. This may sound cheesy but public service is public trust. In order for the people to trust the law, its enforcers must give it their full attention. Crime doesn’t take a day off, it’s another corny line but it’s true, officers of the law shouldn’t either. The only defense the public has is the people enforce the laws of the land. â€Å"To serve and protect†, that’s an officer’s motto. It never said anything about clocking out.

Thursday, March 12, 2020

How to Avoid the Biggest Workplace Distraction

How to Avoid the Biggest Workplace Distraction So many hours in a day, but never enough time to get things done†¦ or so it seems. In reality, the hours that comprise a workday are often plenty of time to complete your tasks. According to CareerBuilder, 4 of the top 5 productivity killers at work are tech-based: email, texting, Internet surfing, and social media. Little moments here and there of checking your phone or browsing on Twitter can add up to hours of wasted time. Your first step? Take one week to carefully log how you spend each and every moment of your day. Then, add up your non-work-related tech time. You might be surprised at how it’s eating away from your work day.Next, aim to cut back. Put your phone on silent or â€Å"Do Not Disturb† mode, only allowing emergency contacts to reach you during work hours. Then, divert yourself from the call of social media. When you find yourself loading up Facebook or Instagram, walk away. Take a super-quick walk around the office to clear your mind and get back o n track. When you sit back down, it’s back to work you go.Of course, most workplaces do come with a barrage of email you are obligated to tackle. Set aside 10 minutes every hour to do nothing but read, sort, and answer email. Unless it’s urgent, don’t answer or read your email until then–focus on completing tasks instead.A combination of poor time management and electronic distraction often suck up your time until you’re left with a pile of uncompleted work. Figure out where your time is going and transform wasted hours into productivity.Your Top 10 Productivity Killers And How To Fix ThemRead More at Fast Company

Monday, February 24, 2020

Case study Q1 and Q2 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Q1 and Q2 - Case Study Example According to the data on fig.18.1 in this article, the market share between 2000-2012 shows progressive growth which clearly indicates competitive performance. The increase in share price means accumulate working capital of mass magnitude which helps it smoothly manage its widely dispersed market across the world. Besides, share prices are an indicator of investor confidence and general better overall performance. The financial and operation performance of Starbucks in table 18.1 in the article indicates significant upward trend in balance sheet from 2005 towards 2011. The meaning behind this is a strong and large asset base which explains overall desirable performance. Considering the wide geographical dispersion of Starbuck stores, the financial report indicates a sustainable future. Ranking by chain stores and market size put Starbuck ahead of the pack at 10789 followed by Horton with a gap of more than 1000 stores as shown in fig.18.3. It is worth to infer that Starbuck is doing well in the industry in terms of market size, financial gain and global presence. The success of Starbuck has come as result of creative and critical thinking of its management team. In regard to its significantly competitive market environment, strategic measures have put it through an upward growth. Historical background of the firm exhibit is as having started on an unstable ground until Schultz took over as the Chief Executive officer. Survival in the coffee industry has come far for this firm mainly as a result of realizing diversity of human tastes and customer care. At the centre of its success is diversity in its coffee brand. The cultural and economic uniqueness of its global market requires that it differentiate its product to meet their individual tastes and preferences. In this regard, Starbuck has differentiated its coffee brand into various tastes. Besides, it reframed its business model and marketing approaches. This included licensing retailers to

Saturday, February 8, 2020

The Effect of PeerTutoring and Computer Assisted Tutoring on Thesis

The Effect of PeerTutoring and Computer Assisted Tutoring on Standardized Math Scores - Thesis Example The purpose of this action research study is to determine the value of tutoring strategies in augmenting mathematical studies for junior high school students. My purpose is to study the results of two types of tutoring programs used with adolescent groups. The two tutorial groups are computer assisted instruction and peer-tutoring. Raul Yzaguirre School for Success (RYSS) is an urban charter school with a majority-minority Hispanic student population. RYSS is a Title I school with 100% of the students receiving free and reduced lunch. I am currently teaching Language Arts for the eighth grade while obtaining my administration internship. The purpose of the study is to discover the best available strategy to aid RYSS students in the improvement of their standardized test scores for mathematics. The administrative team at RYSS has approved a tutoring program for summer school students. Tutoring fits into the larger context of education because (a) tutoring helps students who are struggling while allowing them to engage in a challenging, rigorous learning experience; (b) tutoring assists students in moving toward grade level achievement, and (c) tutoring builds successful students so that they move from success to succes

Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Love in Pride and Prejudice Essay Example for Free

Love in Pride and Prejudice Essay Marriage in England in the nineteenth century is much different than it is in today’s world. Almost everyone wants to marry for love and happiness. During this period of time, beautiful women would marry a man because he is rich or the opposite. A nice looking man would marry a woman because she comes from wealth. Love is left out of these marriages. Some thought they would soon develop love along the years. Mrs. Bennet’s main priority throughout the book was to make sure here five daughters were married to a rich suitor. Money was the main concerns for her not love. Her marriage was based on the principle of monetary gain. She thought her daughters would not be able to survive if they remained unmarried. For any woman of her time marriage on any terms was often the only getaway from a miserable life of poverty. Elizabeth did not want to marry for money. She wanted to marry for love. She turned her first proposal down from Mr. Collins because she had no feelings for him. Elizabeth shows a lot of pride throughout the book. Even though her family was not of upper class, she still held her head high with pride. She is a middle class woman who wants to be treated the same by every one no matter who it is. She believes herself to be good enough for any man. When she first meets Mr. Darcy, she says that he is very attractive. Prejudice blinds her and leads to false opinions of Mr. Darcy. She overhears him say, â€Å"She is tolerable, but not handsome enough to tempt me. † Darcy is very blinded by his inferior standards. Jane Bennet and Mr. Bingley are happy when they are together. Mrs. Bennet was so sure they would marry within months. They were so shocked to hear that he had left town so suddenly. Mr. Darcy breaks them up before their relationship could get as far as marriage. He didn’t honestly believe that Jane was truly in love with his good friend Mr. Bingley. Elizabeth believes that he did this because of his prejudice for the lower class. Mr. Darcy believed that Jane was only after his money. Jane is very broken up over Mr. Bingley leaving town. They both loved one another. Mr. Darcy later writes a letter to Elizabeth, explaining the real reason why he broke them up. After reading his letter, she begins to understand the pride that Mr. Darcy has for himself. This is where she begins to have feelings for him. Her youngest sister Lydia runs away and marries Mr. Wickham. Soon Jane and Mr. Bingley reunite and he proposes to her. Elizabeth finds out that Mr. Darcy had bribed Mr. Wickham to marry her sister. She soon realizes Mr. Darcy isn’t a bad person after all. He is a great person and a romantic at heart. After his second proposal to Elizabeth she agrees to marry him, not for money but for love. Happiness does not come from a marriage based on money.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Test Of Courage :: essays research papers

Test of Courage On the night of September 30th 1999, I was about to begin what would seem to be the longest night of my life. Weeks of physical, mental, and emotional training would climax and end after this final test. A test of endurance, teamwork, mental focus, and most of all courage was about to begin. Thoughts raced through my head as I anxiously prepared myself. Will I remember everything I have been trained? Will my shipmates let me down? Some had dreaded this night for weeks; others awaited its arrival like children on Christmas morning. I had a mixture of feelings, as I was about to begin what the Navy calls Battle Stations. Battle Stations is a fourteen-hour test of everything that had been taught in the previous thirteen weeks of boot camp. The most difficult part of Battle Stations is dealing with the sleep depravation accumulated over the previous weeks. We were allowed two hours of sleep before the challenge that would "make or break" us. I can remember the dark barracks, lit only by red lights representing emergency procedures in a ship setting. The room seemed to have a very still, quiet feel like a storm was creeping near. My bunkmate Johnson and I polished our boots as we agreed that neither of us would sleep for the two hours we are given. Johnson and I had developed a close friendship over time and we motivated each other in every obstacle we faced. He was slightly taller than I, had a stalky frame and spoke with a thick East Coast accent that I often humorously imitated. I laid in my bunk focusing on my body, and what will be expected from it tonight. By that time, I had been awake for several hours and lack of food caused fatigue to set in. Piercing alarm sirens and bright flashing lights interrupted my concentration; our excitingly eventful night had just begun. Within seven minutes my entire division was in full gear with tight seals on our gas masks and standing at attention in front of our bunks. Then something unexpected happened. A team of Ex-Navy Seal's rushed into the barracks like a stampede of wild horses. Their presence motivated us all as we began chanting Navy songs. Before I knew it we were barreling down the stairs of the barracks, or "Ship" as it is called in the Navy.

Monday, January 13, 2020

Persists in central Africans Essay

The text notes that an alternate allele of the hemoglobin gene can cause sickle-cell anemia when a person is homozygous for this allele, but that a person who is heterozygous for the allele actually can derive a benefit from it–protection from malaria. In the United States, 8 percent of African Americans are carriers for the sickle-cell allele, while in central Africa the figure is 20 percent. What could account for this difference? Assess. Answer: The difference could be accounted for by the prevalence of malaria disease in central Africa. Heterozygous carriers of the disease are resistant to malaria. Furthermore, there is a at leasr a 25% chance that the heterozygous trait is passed on to the next generation. Malaria is more prevalent in central Africa than in America. African Americans are not as exposed to malaria as central Africans are. Therefore, the sickle-cell trait is being faced out gradually in African Americans. Central Africans on the other hand are continually exposed to the disease. The trait therefore persists in their genome. More malaria resistant individuals are born. Unfortunately, they are heterozygous carriers of the sickle-cell trait. When two heterozygous individuals produce offsprings, there is a 25% chance that a one of them is a homozygous for sickle-cell disease. Therefore, the trait persists in central Africans.